Interstate Insurance Compacts vs. PPACA Exchanges on the Roadmap to Health Care Freedom

About Steve Klein

serves as Staff Attorney and Research Counsel for the Wyoming Liberty Group.

Interstate Health Insurance Compacts vs. PPACA Exchanges

Last year, the Wyoming Legislature granted the insurance commissioner the power to establish interstate health insurance compacts in Enrolled Act 61. This law “recognizes the need of individuals seeking medical and surgical health insurance coverage in this state to have the opportunity to choose among competitive medical and surgical insurance plans that are affordable and flexible.” Following this year’s Legislative Session, an interim committee has been assigned the task of responding to federal regulatory initiatives, including health insurance exchanges required under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare).

What’s the difference between compacts and exchanges and how would they affect Wyoming?

In the second issue of the Liberty Brief, Regina Meena compares and contrasts health insurance compacts and PPACA health insurance exchanges. She illustrates how the compact model would maximize individual choice in health care and open the door to a better, broader market for Wyoming, while exchanges would invite more federal control, less individual choice, and more unbearable costs for health care.

Click here to download this issue.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Highlight3 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>